I’ll admit that there aren’t many topics I’m more passionate about than interactive whiteboards in the classroom.
Seen as the first step towards “21st century teaching and learning,” schools and districts run out and spend thousands of dollars on these gizmos, hanging them on walls and showing them off like proud hens that just laid the golden instructional egg.
Read the related story,
I gave mine away last summer. After about a year’s worth of experimenting, I determined that it was basically useless.
Sure, my students thought it was nifty, but it didn’t make teaching my required curriculum any easier. I probably crafted two or three neat lessons with it, but there was nothing unique about those activities. I could have easily put together similar lessons using the computer stations I already have in my room and any number of free online tools.
A couple of weeks ago, when I learned of a Twitter Ed Chat about interactive whiteboards, I hurried right over. Even after an appliance meltdown, a minor flood, and a two-hour trip to the laundromat, there was no way I was going to let a conversation about whiteboards slip away.
Thankfully, there was a lot of wisdom in the Ed Chat room. Few people spent any meaningful time praising the instructional goodness of IWBs, and the majority of participants recognized that without time and training, they quickly become nothing more than really expensive overhead projectors.
I’d go even farther, though. I’m willing to argue that even with time and training, interactive whiteboards are an under-informed and irresponsible purchase. They do little more than reinforce a teacher-centric model of learning. Heck, even whiteboard companies market them as a bridging technology, designed to replicate traditional instructional practices (make presentations, give notes, deliver lectures) in an attempt to move digital teacher-dinosaurs into the light. I ask you: Do we really want to spend thousands of dollars on a tool that makes stand-and-deliver instruction easier?
My biggest IWB beef, though, is that they are poorly aligned with the vision of instruction that most people claim to believe in. Ask a principal what the best classrooms look like and she’s likely to say something like this:
“In the best classrooms, students are involved in creating knowledge together. They’re studying topics, designing experiments, collaborating with peers, and challenging one another’s preconceived notions. While the teacher is always present to guide and to facilitate, the students are empowered to discover and to grow independently.”
Sounds great, doesn’t it? If we could turn control of learning over to students, we’d probably see motivation and academic growth levels rise all at once. Classrooms would become innovative places that students were drawn to instead of the snooze palaces that they seem to be for so many kids today.
But if those are the outcomes we most desire, then why are we wasting money on interactive whiteboards—tools that do little to promote independent discovery and collaborative work? Sure, you could argue that when used as an instructional center, whiteboards become more interactive, but that is one really expensive center, don’t you think?
I’m also peeved because schools rarely have any kind of system in place to evaluate the impact that whiteboards are having on instruction. We spend heaping piles of cash collecting whiz-bang gadgets and then completely fail to reflect on whether or not they have helped us achieve the outcomes we most desire. Isn’t that called hoarding?
Frankly, it seems like most school leaders don’t really care whether IWBs change instruction in meaningful ways in their school’s classrooms. Why? Because whiteboards aren’t an instructional tool in their eyes. They’re a PR tool—a tangible representation of innovation that can be shown off to supervisors and parents alike. Heaven forbid that you run a school without whiteboards if your colleagues down the street have taken a big bite of this 21st century fruit. You’ll look like a hayseed at the next PTA meeting, won’t you?
I think Sylvia Martinez, who writes at Generation Yes, said it best: “You can’t buy change. It’s a process, not a purchase. The right shopping list won’t change education.”
Most of the time, interactive whiteboard programs are, in fact, nothing more than vain attempts to buy change. Rarely paired with a clear vision of the classrooms we’d like to see, a set of tangible objectives that can be measured, or any systematic attempts to evaluate outcomes, these high-priced contraptions are sad examples of the careless decision-making and waste that are crippling some of our schools and systems.
As seen in many school systems, a lot of schools are starting to switch over to an interactive approach to teaching. One of the ways this has been done is through interactive electronic whiteboards, also known as SMART Boards. A SMART Board is a device that is used to replace the standard white board in your everyday classroom. The SMART Board is a device that interacts hand–in-hand with computer software. Students and teachers can draw on the board or use their hands as a mouse to move or draw objects on the board. At any point in time the teacher can save the work that was completed on the SMART Board, just like you would on a computer, and come back to it when needed. Dr. Mary Ann Bell from teachers.net Gazette stated that SMART Boards offer a wide variety of color and tools to use. Studies have shown that students’ attention span is greater and they are more alert where color is presented and where writing on the board can be customized based on fun features that the software offers. We have seen the shift in classrooms from the traditional whiteboard to these new interactive SMART Boards. There are some advantages and disadvantages to switching over to these new SMART Boards in the classrooms. As we enter a new era in technology it is important as future teachers to consider investing in SMART Boards for your classroom because it really will benefit your students.
What is a SMART Board?
[
edit
|
edit source
]
A SMART Board is an interactive white board that was created in 1991 by David Martin and Nancy Knowlton. The name "smart board" refers to an interactive white board which requires software and tools in order to work properly. They are specifically called "SMART" because the company SMART technologies named their interactive whiteboards, SMART Board. The SMART Board is the first interactive white board to provide touch control computer applications over the standard Microsoft applications. A SMART Board enables the teacher and students in the classroom to save and store any information that they write on it. This board also allows for students and teachers to search the web and download programs on the SMART Board itself. Although SMART Boards act as a computer, this interactive whiteboard does not have the traditional keyboard or mouse. The SMART Board has a tray at the bottom of the screen which holds SMART Board pens. These trays have sensors in them so the board knows which tool is being used when the object is lifted from the tray. The SMART Board also has a function where it allows the user to bring up a keyboard on the screen if you need to type. To operate the keyboard you just simply use it as a touch screen function (touching the key intended). Smart boards also provide us with many math tools (dice, graph paper, charts, protractors, rulers, shapes, and etc.) and supplies to use during math lessons. When you purchase a SMART Board it comes with two
software programs. These programs are notebook and SMART book tools. These are both valuable software programs, but can be difficult and frustrating to work with if you do not use them correctly. As a teacher using a smart board you are able to create lessons, projects, powerpoints and much more on a computer and transfer this to your smart board to enable student interaction during class. Smart boards are compatible with all Microsoft office software programs.
Today smart boards are not only being seen across the world in classrooms, but smart boards are also being used in college lecture halls, group meetings, and presentations. If you are a smart board user an important website to utilize is Smart Exchange. This is a website created by SMART Technologies where teachers post lessons they have created and used in their classrooms. The lessons posted on the website are available for teachers to download and use in their classroom without giving credit to whomever created it. As a teacher when you create something worth while you should contribute in posting your own lessons for others to utilize as well. If you download a lesson you are able to make changes, only use portions, expand the lesson, or do whatever you want to the lesson to make it most valuable for your own classroom. Click Smart Exchange to visit website.
How It All Got Started?
[
edit
|
edit source
]
Smartboards began being seen in school classrooms in 1991 when schools decided it was time to begin integrating technology into their everyday curriculum. The first smart board was an LCD pannel and a computer running integrated programs. This "smart board" was designed to work as a large display screen. Intel Corporation took an interest in these piece of technology and became a minority investor in the company in the year of 1992. New versions of the smart board are released every year, as our knowledge in technology increases so does the development of smart boards. In the year 1999 the first plasma display smart board was introduced.
Use In A Classroom
[
edit
|
edit source
]
Advantages & Disadvantages
[
edit
|
edit source
]
As with any new item that is being introduced, one must consider the advantages and disadvantages before jumping to any conclusions. Many would say that SMART Boards are an excellent resource to have in classrooms because there are so many pros to having them in the classroom. Dr. Mary Ann Bell from teacher.net created a list of advantages of SMART Boards in the classroom that she has gathered based on communicating with other teachers. Here is a list of some of those advantages to having a SMART Board in the classroom, as opposed to having a traditional whiteboard in the classroom.
Listed above were some advantages of having a SMART Board in the classroom, and how it benefits from replacing the traditional whiteboard to something more interactive in the classroom. To get both sides of the story you must look at the good qualities and the bad qualities to any big purchase you are going to be making. Some disadvantages to switching over to SMART Boards instead of the traditional whiteboards are:
Training and Professional Development
[
edit
|
edit source
]
Visit SmartTech to find out where to go for training on SMART Boards and to also connect to other SMART Board users. SMART provides a variety of ways for educators to connect and collaborate to make the most of the SMART products.
Here is a list of what is offered:
SMART Board Products and Accessories
[
edit
|
edit source
]
SMART Boards are great interactive devices that will benefit any classroom. The SMART Board is used to replace the traditional white board. SMART Boards can be used in the classroom many different ways. For example, the teacher can do digital storytelling/reading of books online, brainstorming with students and teacher during “think out-loud,” note taking, and gives the ability to use interactive websites as a whole class. The SMART Board allows for more interaction from the students and is set up to meet the needs of various learning styles. The teachers do not have to worry about using chalk and getting the chalk dust everywhere and they no longer have to worry about buying dry erase markers when their other markers dry up. There are other products and accessories available to use with a SMART Board, which can tailor the SMART Board to fit all the needs of children in the classroom. There are many advantages to using the SMART Boards in the classrooms, but there are also some disadvantages to take into account. Technology is great, but with any device, you always should be prepared if problems occur. Teachers should have a backup plan for their lessons if the SMART Board were to stop working for whatever reason. The biggest disadvantage is SMART Boards are a lot more costly than a white board, which may be difficult for many schools to afford, especially with the economy the way it is right now. rResearch shows that there are so many benefits for the students if they are introduced to using a smart board. Not only do the teachers enjoy using them, the students enjoy it as well and it helps make learning fun for them.
Archer, B. (2003). In What is a Smartboard?. Retrieved November 29, 2010, from http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-smartboard.htm
How to Incorporate Technology Into The Classroom. (2010). In Teachers Network. Retrieved November 30, 2010, from http://www.teachersnetwork.org/ntny/nychelp/technology/smartbrd.htm
SMART. (2010). Featured Products. In SMART Boards: Serving The New York Tri-State Area. Retrieved November 23, 2010, from http://smartboards.com/
Smart Technologies. (2010). All SMART Products. Retrieved November 29, 2010, from http://www.smarttech.com/us/Solutions/All+Products
Smart Technologies. (2010). Content and Community. Retrieved November 29, 2010, from http://smarttech.com/Home%20Page/Resources/Training/Content%20and%20Community
Springgay, J. (2010). What is the History of the Smart Board?. In eHOW. Retrieved December 1, 2010, from http://www.ehow.com/facts_4915092_what-history-smart-board.html
Teacher Net. (2002, January). Teacher Future. In Teacher.Net. Retrieved November 23, 2010, from http://teachers.net/gazette/JAN02/mabell.html